Neurofunction > Volume 20(2); 2024 > Article
Kim, Yang, and Kim: Stereotactic radiosurgery for meningioma

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a validated treatment option for intracranial meningioma as an upfront, adjuvant, or salvage modality. SRS was initially used as an alternative treatment for patients with unfavorable surgical risks or high-risk tumors. However, evidence from large cohort and long-term follow-up studies has consolidated the efficacy and long-term durability of SRS in the treatment of meningioma. Here, we review the current indications and patient outcomes following SRS.

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas, originating from the arachnoid cap cells, represent the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, accounting for 13-26% in adults [1]. The frequency of meningioma occurrence increases with age, in the overall population ranges from 2.3 cases per 100,000 people throughout their lifespan to 5.5 per 100,000 when autopsy data is taken into account [2,3]. Meningiomas are found in various regions, including the convexity (20-37%), parasagittal (13-22%, including falcine meningiomas [5%]), frontobasal (10-20%), sphenoid and middle cranial fossa (9-36%), posterior fossa (6-15%), tentorium cerebelli (2-4%), cerebellar convexity (5%), cerebellopontine angle (2-11%), foramen magnum (3%), and petroclival (<1-9%). They may also occur in intraventricular (1-5%), orbital (<1-2%), and ectopic locations [4]. Multiple meningioma may manifest due to prior radiation exposure or neurofibromatosis type 2.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 classification, benign meningioma constitute roughly 90% of cases, with the remainder categorized as atypical (WHO grade 2) or anaplastic (WHO grade 3) [1,5]. While benign meningiomas typically display well-defined borders, they can demonstrate biologically aggressive behavior by infiltrating adjacent dura, brain tissue, and bone, thereby heightening the risk of recurrence. Currently, maximal safe surgical resection remains the preferred treatment for meningiomas, achieving complete resection can be challenging due to large tumor size, deep tumor location, and proximity to critical neural or vascular structures. Postoperative complications, neurological deficits, tumor recurrence, and mortality can be potential outcomes associated with craniotomy [6-12]. Despite subtotal resection being pivotal for alleviating mass effect symptoms, it proves insufficient as a standalone modality, with 5-, 10-, and 15-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates hovering around 50%, 40%, and 30%, respectively [13].
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) including Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS), provides a minimal invasion, is a more efficient treatment, and has fewer complications for patients with intracranial meningiomas, and is now attracting increasing attention from neurosurgeons. Hence, alternative approaches such as SRS in single or staged sessions, along with hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, have been employed in both primary and adjuvant settings [14-19]. In this study, we reviewed the current indications, radiobiology, and clinical outcomes following GKS for meningioma.

INDICATIONS FOR GAMMA KNIFE IN INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMA

When considering single-session SRS for intracranial meningiomas, key factors include tumor size, ideally less than 3 cm in diameter or 10 cm3 in volume, presence of surrounding edema, and proximity to vital structures such as the optic apparatus, brainstem, pituitary stalk, and cochlea. While large symptomatic meningiomas typically require surgical removal, management choices for small or incidentally discovered meningiomas encompass watchful waiting, surgery, and SRS [20]. Radiosurgery could be considered as the initial treatment for small to medium-sized tumors showing progression on successive imaging studies. Furthermore, several authors suggested that upfront GKS for asymptomatic meningiomas could be advantageous and involve minimal morbidity, as two-thirds of asymptomatic meningiomas under observation eventually increased in size, with half of them ultimately requiring neurosurgical intervention [21]. Alternatively, it may serve as part of a combined approach alongside planned subtotal resection for tumors situated in critical areas [22]. In fact, a comparative study revealed that patients undergoing a combined approach of planned GKS following a non-radical resection led to a substantially lower recurrence rate of 10% [23]. Furthermore, staged radiosurgery has been documented for larger tumors ranging from 20 to 30 cm3, wherein two or more distinct tumor volumes are treated with an interval of several months [24].

TREATMENT PLANNING AND RADIOBIOLOGY OF GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR MENINGIOMA

In modern radiosurgical protocols, it's common to prescribe a dose of 12-16 Gy to the tumor margin at the 50% isodose level [17]. Slight modifications to the treatment isodose may be implemented to guarantee optimal coverage of the tumor with the prescribed dose. Nevertheless, tumors located near radiation-sensitive critical structures may receive a lower dose than prescribed to adhere to radiation tolerance limits for these structures. These criteria consist of ensuring a maximum optic nerve dose of less than 8-10 Gy, a mean cochlea dose under 4-6 Gy, and a maximum brainstem dose below 15 Gy (with a goal of restricting the brainstem volume receiving 12 Gy to less than 10 mm3) [25]. The quantity of isocenters needed to achieve precise treatment varies depending on the tumor's shape, which can be irregular, particularly when addressing meningiomas, especially those involving the dural tail. The effectiveness of GKS treatment for meningiomas is believed to result from a dual mechanism: the suppression of tumor cell replication and the induction of vascular changes leading to fibrosis and necrosis. Upon examining the pathological samples from patients with benign meningioma following GKS, biopsies of enhancing regions are associated with inflammation, demyelination and cystic degeneration [26,27]. Biopsies taken from non-enhancing areas revealed coagulative necrosis, edema, vasculopathy, and reactive gliosis [26].

OVERVIEW OF MENINGIOMA OUTCOMES FOLLOWING GAMMA KNIFE

The tumor control rates and its long-term durability of GKS is excellent (Table 1) [17,28-34]. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis examining radiosurgery outcomes for intracranial meningiomas, it was found that the overall rates of disease control ranged from 87% to 100% at the 5-year and from 67% to 100% at the 10-year [35]. In addition, 5-year PFS rate varied between 78 and 98.9%, while at ten years, it ranged from 53.1% to 97.2%. The comprehensive symptom management rate was 92.3%, with an overall toxicity rate of 8.1%.
In the case of benign meningiomas, numerous studies indicate that the long-term control rate with GKS surpasses 90%. Kondziolka et al. [36] examined outcomes in 972 patients with a collective total of 1,045 intracranial meningiomas. Approximately half (49%) of these patients had previously undergone surgical resection, with the mean volume of treated tumors measuring 7.4 cm3 [36]. For patients receiving adjuvant GKS treatment following prior resection, the overall control rate was 93%. Among primary GKS patients who had not undergone prior surgery, the tumor control rate reached 97%. However, outcomes were less favorable for adjuvant SRS in WHO grade 2 and 3 tumors, with tumor control rates of 50% and 17%, respectively. After a follow-up of 10 years or longer, adjuvant treatment resulted in the control of grade 1 tumors in 91% of patients (n=53). The overall morbidity rate was 7.7%, with symptomatic imaging changes occurring in 4% of cases at an average of 8 months after GKS, with a higher incidence observed in patients with parasagittal and convexity meningiomas. The authors emphasized minimal risks of radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) by limiting the optic apparatus dose to less than 8 Gy.

Convexity meningiomas

Meningiomas predominantly occur in the convexity region, representing about 30% of cases. In a study by Kondziolka et al. [37], 115 patients with benign convexity meningiomas were treated with irradiation, receiving a mean dose of 14.2 Gy. The 3- and 5-year actuarial control rates were reported as 95% and 86%, respectively [37]. The overall morbidity rate was 10%, with 5% of cases experiencing symptomatic peritumoral edema or adverse radiation effects on imaging. Hence, for non-surgical cases involving small to medium-sized tumors, Gamma Knife therapy offers a viable treatment option for achieving long-lasting tumor control with minimal toxicity risks.

Parasagittal/parafalcine meningiomas

Parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas are the second most frequent sites for intracranial meningiomas. Due to their proximity to critical structures such as the superior sagittal sinus or other venous sinuses, achieving complete surgical removal can be challenging. This scenario often necessitates the use of SRS either as the primary treatment modality or as an adjunctive therapy. A study conducted by the Virginia group investigated 65 patients with parasagittal (59%) and parafalcine (41%) meningiomas. These patients received treatment with a median prescription dose of 15 Gy, resulting in 3- and 5-year tumor control rates of 85% and 70%, respectively [38]. The authors suggested that the relatively lower control rates compared to other locations could be attributed to longer dural tails, potentially leading to higher recurrence rates. Symptomatic peritumoral edema was observed in four patients (8.2%), with three patients (6.1%) experiencing temporary symptoms and one patient (2%) facing permanent clinical consequences. Additionally, two patients (4.1%) succumbed to tumor progression. In a subsequent publication from the same group focusing on cerebral edema following Gamma Knife treatment for parasagittal meningiomas, it was found that new or increased peritumoral edema occurred in 40% of treated cases [39]. The median time to peak edema was 36 months post-GKS. Persistent and progressive edema led to surgical resection in 11 tumors, while 20 patients exhibited initial edema progression followed by regression at a median of 18 months after radiosurgery (range, 6-24 months). Notably, factors such as initial tumor volume exceeding 10 cm3, absence of prior resection, and a higher margin dose were significantly associated with an increased risk of new or progressive edema after GKS.

Skull base meningiomas

An increasing number of long-term studies has provided evidence supporting the enduring efficacy, symptom stability or improvement, and favorable safety profile of GKS for skull base meningiomas. In a study by Kreil et al. [40], which included 200 patients with skull base meningiomas treated with a median marginal dose of 12 Gy and followed for at least 5 years, the actuarial PFS rate was 98.5% at 5 years and 97.2% at 10 years. Only two patients (1%) experienced transient radiation-induced edema. In 83 cases (41.5%), there was an improvement in neurological status, while it remained unchanged in 108 cases (54%) and deteriorated in nine cases (4.5%). Five patients (2.5%) underwent repeat microsurgical resection following GKS. The Virginia group reported similar long-term results for 255 patients of skull base meningiomas located in areas such as the cerebellopontine angle, clivus, petroclival, and parasellar regions [39]. Over a median follow-up period of 6.5 years (range, 2-18 years) and with an average volume of 5.0 cm3, overall tumor control rate was 86% and the actuarial PFS rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 99%, 96%, and 79%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis identified risk factors correlated with tumor progression, including age over 65 years (hazard ratio [HR]=3.41; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.63-7.13; p=0.001) and a decreasing dose to tumor margin (HR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.00; p=0.05).

Parasellar/cavernous sinus/petroclival region meningiomas

Meningiomas situated in the parasellar region often extend into the suprasellar, cavernous sinus, and petroclival regions, posing challenges due to their proximity to adjacent neurovascular structures. Given the risks associated with complete surgical resection, GKS emerges as a viable alternative or adjunctive therapeutic approach. Involving 189 patients diagnosed with parasellar meningiomas, the study revealed a median tumor volume of 5.6 cm3. These patients underwent treatment with GKS, either as the primary approach (44%) or as adjuvant therapy, demonstrating effective control of tumor volume in 91.5% of cases. Notably, tumor progression occurred at similar rates for infield recurrences (4.2%) and out-of-field recurrences (4.2%) [41]. Out of the 54 cases where new or worsening deficits were observed, 19 were associated with trigeminal nerve dysfunction, and 18 were linked to optic nerve dysfunction. Remarkably, 90.7% (n=49) of these deficits were attributed to tumor progression, with only 9.3% (n=5) attributable to GKS (i.e., 2.64%; n=5/189). Patients who received a margin dose exceeding 16 Gy exhibited significantly improved PFS rates for up to 15 years. Early follow-up volumetric measurements conducted at the 3-year mark reliably predicted long-term volume changes and tumor volume control, with a statistical significance at the 10-year follow-up.
In a study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh involving 159 individuals who underwent 164 interventions for cavernous sinus meningiomas, 83 patients (52%) underwent primary radiosurgery [42]. Only two patients (1%) had previously undergone fractionated radiotherapy, while four patients (2%) presented with atypical or malignant meningiomas. The median dose administered to the tumor margin was 13 Gy. Improvements in neurological status were noted in 46 patients (29%), stability was observed in 99 (62%), and deterioration occurred in 14 (9%). Adverse effects from radiation were observed in 11 patients (6.7%). Tumor volumes decreased in 54 patients (34%), remained stable in 96 (60%), and increased in nine (6%). Among the 83 patients treated solely with GKS, the tumor control rate after 5 years was forecasted as 96.9%. In another study series, involving 168 patients with petroclival meningiomas treated with GKS, the overall PFS rates at 5 and 10 years were reported as 91% and 86%, respectively [43]. These patients had a median tumor volume of 6.1 cm3. Notably, tumor volume reduction was observed in nearly half (46%) of the cases, and symptom control was achieved in approximately 85% of the patients. Given the significant surgical risks and the intricate proximity to critical neurovascular structures in the cavernous/petroclival region, Gamma Knife emerges as a safe and effective management strategy for meningiomas, presenting itself as a primary treatment option for tumors of appropriate volume.

Intraventricular meningiomas

Intraventricular meningiomas (IVMs), rare tumors with challenging locations, pose considerable treatment morbidity. Research conducted at the University of Pittsburgh presents a 35-year experience in utilizing GKS for IVMs [44]. Among 19 patients with 20 meningiomas, a median tumor volume was 4.8 mL and a median margin dose was 14 Gy. PFS rates were 95% at 5 years and 85% at 10 years. In a recent systematic review identified 33 patients who received primary SRS between 1999 and 2015 [45]. The mean tumor volume was 8.7 cm3, and the mean radiation dose administered was 14 Gy. The study revealed that 67% exhibited a partial or marginal response, while 33% maintained stable disease. Notably, no disease progression was observed. SRS for IVMs demonstrates excellent treatment efficacy and low toxicity over a long follow-up period. GKS emerges as an effective and safe management option for these tumors.

Atypical and malignant meningiomas

Atypical meningiomas, comprising 5-10% of all meningiomas, pose a higher risk of local recurrence despite thorough surgical removal, prompting consideration of postoperative radiotherapy. In a study involving 18 patients with 58 atypical lesions treated with GKS and followed up for a median of 36 months, noted three cases of local relapse, five cases of marginal relapse, and seven cases of distant relapse [46]. The actuarial rates for local control were 89% at 1 year and 71% at 3 years, for marginal control were 81% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years, and for distant control were 100% at 1 year, 81% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years, with a median distant control of 38 months. The PFS rates stood at 71% at the end of the first year, 36% by the second year, and dropped to 23% by the third year, with a median PFS duration of 18 months. Lesions receiving ≤12 Gy radiation dose had significantly higher rates of local relapse, and marginal control was notably influenced by tumor growth rate, with slower growth associated with better marginal control. The authors reported few complications with no lasting effects and recommended an expanded target volume encompassing the dural tail to optimize local and marginal control.
Malignant meningiomas have a considerably poorer prognosis due to high rates of both local and distant recurrence. A recent analysis of an extensively managed cohort revealed a median overall survival of 55 months [47]. The authors employed SRS either as an augmentation to fractionated radiotherapy or as a rescue therapy. Present evidence regarding radiosurgery indicates its potential in addressing residual or recurrent malignant meningioma, encompassing distant focal ailments. However, additional investigations are required to completely delineate this function.

The role of fractionated radiosurgery for large meningiomas

With the recent introduction of Gamma Knife ICON (Elekta AB), the possibility of hypofractionation, treating a lesion in 2-5 fractions, has become more viable [48]. This strategy may be contemplated to reduce the potential risk of radiation-induced toxicity of a single-session GKS, especially for large meningiomas located near critical structures. In a retrospective study involving 70 patients treated with GKS for meningiomas larger than 10 cm3 in volume [49], the results of those who underwent single-session treatment were contrasted with those who received fractionated treatment. Among the 42 patients in the single-session GKS cohort, the median tumor volume measured 15.2 cm3, with a median prescribed dose of 12 Gy. In the fractionated GKS cohort consisting of 28 patients, the median tumor volume was 21 cm3. The fractionated GKS group showed a higher trend of 5-year PFS rate (92.9% vs. 88.1%). Moreover, patients in the fractionated GKS group showed a reduced incidence of complications compared to those in the single-session GKS group (p=0.017; HR=5.7:1). Additional long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.

RADIATION-INDUCED COMPLICATIONS

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy

Radiation damage to the optic apparatus can lead to decreased visual acuity, visual field impairments, or vision loss, typically occurring within 3 years after treatment. In the context of single-fraction SRS or fractionated radiosurgery, RION is relatively rare, with an incidence of approximately 1-2% in studies from the 2000s [50]. In a study by Tishler et al. [51], 62 patients treated with radiosurgery, focusing on cranial nerve tolerance, especially in cases involving meningiomas near the cavernous sinus. Twelve patients experienced new cranial neuropathies between 3 to 41 months after radiosurgery [51]. Among these, four cases resulted in optic system damage. Notably, a higher incidence of complications was observed with increasing dose to the optic apparatus. Specifically, 24% of patients receiving doses exceeding 8 Gy to any part of the optic apparatus developed visual complications, compared to none among those receiving less than 8 Gy. In a study involving 50 patients treated with GKS for benign skull base tumors, a total of 66 visual system sites and 210 cranial nerves in the middle cranial fossa were examined. The mean follow-up period was 40 months and the occurrence of optic neuropathy was dependent on the radiation dose: no cases were observed for doses under 10 Gy, while 26.7% occurred for doses between 10 to less than 15 Gy, and 77.8% for doses of 15 Gy or higher [52]. Prior exposure to radiation exhibited a crude 10-fold increase in RION risk compared to individuals with no previous radiation therapy. Among patients lacking a history of radiation therapy who underwent single-fraction or hypofractionated SRS in 1-5 fractions, maximum doses to the optic apparatus associated with RION risks of less than 1% include 12 Gy in one fraction, 20 Gy in three fractions, and 25 Gy in five fractions.

Peritumoral edema

Peritumoral edema is frequently observed in para-sagittal and parafalcine meningiomas and can be classified as either transient or persistent [39]. Transient edema may persist for several months and may necessitate a corticosteroid regimen to facilitate edema resolution. Managing persistent edema poses greater challenges due to the adverse effects profile associated with prolonged steroid use, potentially leading physicians to consider surgical resection of the implicated tumor. Recently, Kim et al. [53] developed a predictive model for post-GKS peritumoral edema using a deep-learning algorithm. They reported 13.9% of peritumoral edema including five radiation necrosis in 202 patients underwent GKS for meningioma. The deep-learning model showed a favorable predictive power [53].

Vascular complications after radiosurgery for meningiomas

Following radiosurgical treatment of meningiomas, vascular complications are uncommon but can be classified as either hemorrhage or vessel occlusion resulting in ischemia [54]. Vascular occlusion, with an incidence of 1-2%, tends to manifest in a delayed manner, often occurring 14-60 months after GKS. Case reports and experimental studies indicate that occlusion of cerebral arteries following radiosurgery occurs due to luminal narrowing related to endothelial damage—a phenomenon seemingly influenced by radiation dosage. Radiation doses surpassing 25 Gy to arteries have been linked to vascular occlusion. However, the exact mechanisms leading to hemorrhage are less clear, potentially involving vessel thrombosis, edema, and rupture in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

GKS has revolutionized the approach of numerous neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists in treating patients with meningiomas. With outcome studies demonstrating prolonged follow-up, the long-term efficacy of tumor control, symptom management, and minimal toxicity is substantiated. Despite the scarcity of reports on radiation-induced complications, it remains crucial to maintain monitoring patients, even when tumor control is satisfactory.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Table 1.
Tumor control rates and long-term durability of Gamma Knife radiosurgery
Authors Patient (n) Volume (mL)/dose (Gy) Median follow-up (mo) Overall tumor control rate (%) Actuarial 10-yr tumor control rate (%) >10-yr follow-up, n (%) Permanent complications (%) Location
Iwai et al. [28] (2008) 108 8.1/12 86 93 83 25 (23.1) 6 Skull base
Zada et al. [34] (2010) 116 3.4/16 75 94 84 NR 8 All
Santacroce et al. [31] (2012) 4,565 4.8/14 63 92.5 88.5 388 (8.5) 6.6 All
Pollock et al. [30] (2012) 416 7.3/16 60 94.2 89 70 (16.8) 11 All
Kondziolka et al. [29] (2016) 290 5.5/15 56 91 88 29 (10.0) 14.5 All
Seo et al. [32] (2018) 424 4.4/14 92 84 78.9 119 (28.1) 4 All
Lippitz et al. [17] (2020) 130 2.5/15 120 87.8 87.8 NR NR All
Shinya et al. [33] (2023) 112 5/7/15 88 87 83 NR 6 Skull base

NR: not reported.

REFERENCES

1. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803-20
crossref pmid pdf
2. Sutherland GR, Florell R, Louw D, Choi NW, Sima AA. Epidemiology of primary intracranial neoplasms in Manitoba, Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 1987;14:586-92
pmid
3. Kurland LT, Schoenberg BS, Annegers JF, Okazaki H, Molgaard CA. The incidence of primary intracranial neoplasms in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935-1977. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1982;381:6-16
crossref pmid
4. Ogasawara C, Philbrick BD, Adamson DC. Meningioma: a review of epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and future directions. Biomedicines 2021;9:319.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231-51
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Castlen JP, Cote DJ, Zaidi HA, Laws ER Jr. The extended, transnasal, transsphenoidal approach for anterior skull base meningioma: considerations in patient selection. Pituitary 2017;20:561-8
crossref pmid pdf
7. Corniola MV, Lemée JM, Da Broi M, Joswig H, Schaller K, Helseth E, et al. Posterior fossa meningiomas: perioperative predictors of extent of resection, overall survival and progression-free survival. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019;161:1003-11
crossref pmid pdf
8. Couldwell WT. Left occipital craniotomy for resection of falcotentorial meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43:V9.
crossref pmid
9. Elarjani T, Shetty R, Singh H, da Silva HB, Sekhar LN. Transpetrosal approach to petro-clival meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43:V1.
crossref pmid
10. Kwinta BM, Krzyżewski RM, Kliś KM, Dragan MR, Donicz P, Gackowska M, et al. Predictive factors of complications post intracranial meningioma surgery leading to early unplanned reoperations: a single center study. Folia Med Cracov 2018;58:5-13
11. Mendez-Rosito D. The supra/infra transtentorial transfalcine approach for the removal of a falcotentorial meningioma: 2-dimensional video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019;16:E166-7
crossref pmid pdf
12. Steinberger J, Bronheim RS, Vempati P, Oermann EK, Ladner TR, Lee NJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of meningioma resection increases in octogenarians. World Neurosurg 2018;109:e16-23
crossref pmid
13. Condra KS, Buatti JM, Mendenhall WM, Friedman WA, Marcus RB Jr, Rhoton AL. Benign meningiomas: primary treatment selection affects survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39:427-36
crossref pmid
14. Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Yasui T, Komiyama M, Nishikawa M, Nakajima H, et al. Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. The effectiveness of low-dose treatment. Surg Neurol 1999;52:40-4
crossref pmid
15. Kim DG, Kim CH, Chung HT, Paek SH, Jeong SS, Han DH, et al. Gamma knife surgery of superficially located meningioma. J Neurosurg 2005;102 Suppl:255-8
crossref pmid
16. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Coffey RJ, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1991;74:552-9
crossref pmid
17. Lippitz BE, Bartek J Jr, Mathiesen T, Förander P. Ten-year follow-up after Gamma Knife radiosurgery of meningioma and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020;162:2183-96
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Oh HJ, Cho YH, Kim JH, Kim CJ, Kwon DH, Lee D, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large-sized skull base meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2020;149:87-93
crossref pmid pdf
19. Pinzi V, Marchetti M, Viola A, Tramacere I, Cane I, Iezzoni C, et al. Hypofractionated radiosurgery for large or in critical-site intracranial meningioma: results of a phase 2 prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;115:153-63
crossref pmid
20. Mohammad MH, Chavredakis E, Zakaria R, Brodbelt A, Jenkinson MD. A national survey of the management of patients with incidental meningioma in the United Kingdom. Br J Neurosurg 2017;31:459-63
crossref pmid
21. Kim KH, Kang SJ, Choi JW, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of proactive Gamma Knife surgery for asymptomatic meningiomas compared with the natural course without intervention. J Neurosurg 2018;130:1740-9
crossref pmid
22. Gatterbauer B, Gevsek S, Höftberger R, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Ertl A, Mallouhi A, et al. Multimodal treatment of parasagittal meningiomas: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2017;127:1249-56
crossref pmid
23. Mathiesen T, Pettersson-Segerlind J, Kihlström L, Ulfarsson E. Meningiomas engaging major venous sinuses. World Neurosurg 2014;81:116-24
crossref pmid
24. Haselsberger K, Maier T, Dominikus K, Holl E, Kurschel S, Ofner-Kopeinig P, et al. Staged gamma knife radiosurgery for large critically located benign meningiomas: evaluation of a series comprising 20 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1172-5
crossref pmid
25. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, et al. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S3-9
crossref pmid pmc
26. Alomari A, Rauch PJ, Orsaria M, Minja FJ, Chiang VL, Vortmeyer AO. Radiologic and histologic consequences of radiosurgery for brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2014;117:33-42
crossref pmid pdf
27. Kondziolka D, Shin SM, Brunswick A, Kim I, Silverman JS. The biology of radiosurgery and its clinical applications for brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:29-44
crossref pmid pmc
28. Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ikeda H. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningioma: long-term results of low-dose treatment. J Neurosurg 2008;109:804-10
crossref pmid
29. Kondziolka D, Patel AD, Kano H, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Long-term outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas. Am J Clin Oncol 2016;39:453-7
crossref pmid
30. Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Link MJ, Brown PD, Garces YI, Foote RL. Single-fraction radiosurgery of benign intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2012;71:604-12
crossref pmid pdf
31. Santacroce A, Walier M, Régis J, Liščák R, Motti E, Lindquist C, et al. Long-term tumor control of benign intracranial meningiomas after radiosurgery in a series of 4565 patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:32-9
crossref pmid pdf
32. Seo Y, Kim DG, Kim JW, Han JH, Chung HT, Paek SH. Long-term outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for benign meningioma: a single institution’s experience with 424 patients. Neurosurgery 2018;83:1040-9
crossref pmid pdf
33. Shinya Y, Hasegawa H, Shin M, Kawashima M, Umekawa M, Katano A, et al. Long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for postoperative World Health Organization grade I skull base meningioma: utility of Ki-67 labeling index as a prognostic indicator. Neurosurgery 2023;93:1144-53
crossref pmid
34. Zada G, Pagnini PG, Yu C, Erickson KT, Hirschbein J, Zelman V, et al. Long-term outcomes and patterns of tumor progression after gamma knife radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2010;67:322-8
crossref pmid pdf
35. Pinzi V, Biagioli E, Roberto A, Galli F, Rizzi M, Chiappa F, et al. Radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017;113:122-34
crossref pmid
36. Kondziolka D, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD, Martin JJ, Madhok R, Niranjan A, et al. Radiosurgery as definitive management of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008;62:53-8
crossref pmid pdf
37. Kondziolka D, Madhok R, Lunsford LD, Mathieu D, Martin JJ, Niranjan A, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for convexity meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2009;111:458-63
crossref pmid
38. Ding D, Xu Z, McNeill IT, Yen CP, Sheehan JP. Radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2013;119:871-7
crossref pmid
39. Sheehan JP, Lee CC, Xu Z, Przybylowski CJ, Melmer PD, Schlesinger D. Edema following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1287-93
crossref pmid
40. Kreil W, Luggin J, Fuchs I, Weigl V, Eustacchio S, Papaefthymiou G. Long term experience of gamma knife radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1425-30
crossref pmid pmc
41. Cohen-Inbar O, Tata A, Moosa S, Lee CC, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of parasellar meningiomas: long-term volumetric evaluation. J Neurosurg 2018;128:362-72
crossref pmid
42. Lee JY, Niranjan A, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2002;97:65-72
crossref pmid
43. Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Sirin S, Tormenti M, Niranjan A, et al. Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2010;112:957-64
crossref pmid
44. Daza-Ovalle A, Bin-Alamer O, Flickinger J, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for intraventricular meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2022;160:23-31
crossref pmid pdf
45. Christ SM, Farhadi DS, Junzhao S, Mahadevan A, Thormann M, Lam FC, et al. Efficacy and safety of primary stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with intraventricular meningiomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022;8:101098.
crossref pmid pmc
46. Valery CA, Faillot M, Lamproglou I, Golmard JL, Jenny C, Peyre M, et al. Grade II meningiomas and Gamma Knife radiosurgery: analysis of success and failure to improve treatment paradigm. J Neurosurg 2016;125:89-96
crossref pmid
47. Balasubramanian SK, Sharma M, Silva D, Karivedu V, Schmitt P, Stevens GH, et al. Longitudinal experience with WHO Grade III (anaplastic) meningiomas at a single institution. J Neurooncol 2017;131:555-63
crossref pmid
48. Stieler F, Wenz F, Abo-Madyan Y, Schweizer B, Polednik M, Herskind C, et al. Adaptive fractionated stereotactic Gamma Knife radiotherapy of meningioma using integrated stereotactic cone-beam-CT and adaptive re-planning (a-gkFSRT). Strahlenther Onkol 2016;192:815-9
crossref pmid pdf
49. Han MS, Jang WY, Moon KS, Lim SH, Kim IY, Jung TY, et al. Is fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery a safe and effective treatment approach for large-volume (>10 cm3) intracranial meningiomas? World Neurosurg 2017;99:477-83
crossref pmid
50. Milano MT, Grimm J, Soltys SG, Yorke E, Moiseenko V, Tomé WA, et al. Single- and multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery dose tolerances of the optic pathways. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;110:87-99
crossref pmid pmc
51. Tishler RB, Loeffler JS, Lunsford LD, Duma C, Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, et al. Tolerance of cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:215-21
crossref pmid
52. Leber KA, Berglöff J, Pendl G. Dose-response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1998;88:43-50
crossref pmid
53. Kim KH, Jung S, Lee HJ, Kwon HJ, Choi SW, Koh HS, et al. A deep neural network-based model predicting peritumoral edema after radiosurgery for meningioma. World Neurosurg 2022;164:e280-9
crossref pmid
54. Barami K, Grow A, Brem S, Dagnew E, Sloan AE. Vascular complications after radiosurgery for meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E9.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2228-2150    Fax: +82-2-393-9979    E-mail: changws@yonsei.ac.kr / changws0716@yuhs.ac                

Copyright © 2025 The Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next